Solutions · Groups & enterprise
A group's hardest problem is not any single brand, it is comparability: twelve teams reporting twelve ways into one board pack that has to say something true about all of them.
The one job this page is about
Compare every brand in the portfolio on one basis.
The roll-up
The board wants one comparable read. Whether it means anything is decided four layers down, where two brands define sell-through differently.
Group
One comparable read. It is only as good as the definitions two layers down.
Brands
Each with its own calendar, its own margin structure and its own idea of what a season is.
Markets
Different duty, different labelling, different compliance clock for the same product.
Definitions
Sell-through, full-price rate and returns measured on different denominators. This is where a roll-up quietly stops meaning anything.
The hard part is the innermost box: two brands on different denominators roll up to a number that is arithmetically correct and tells the board nothing.
Why one set of numbers is hard
The data is rarely missing. Twelve teams each have a defensible answer to the same question.
SELL-THROUGH. Measured against the buy, against the receipt, or against the stock on hand at week one - three numbers, all called sell-through, and a portfolio view that mixes them says nothing.
The definitional choice is a governance decision. Making it once, in writing, is worth more than any dashboard.
FULL PRICE. Whether a promotional price counts as full price decides which brands look healthy. A group with a discount-led brand and a full-price one cannot use a single rule without flattering one of them.
The honest version reports both and says which is which, rather than choosing the flattering one and not saying so.
COMPARABLE GROWTH. What counts as comparable after a store closes, a market is exited or a wholesale account moves to concession is a judgement, and judgements made separately at twelve brands do not add up.
This is the line most often restated a year later, which is the cost of getting it wrong quietly the first time.
One portfolio
Four registers from inside one group. The comparability problem below is what happens when all four answer the same question.

01The flagship

02The wholesale book

03The younger line

04The resort brand
The problem
Twelve brands report twelve different ways.
Every number arrives in its own shape, so the group reconciles instead of deciding.
What we do
Produced once, in one format, with the method named and every figure attributable.
Portfolio overlap is invisible from the inside.
Two houses chase one customer, or share a factory pool nobody mapped.
What we do
Ownership, portfolio and supplier pools are mapped, so overlap is a picture.
Compliance is now a reporting obligation, not a value.
Passport requirements land on the group; the evidence sits in twelve systems.
What we do
Footprints are computed from real materials data and published as registered passports.
How groups & enterprise use it
Every document below opens. None of them is a mockup.
What actually runs
A board pack is a research job, a finance job and a compliance job, and they are not the same person. One system, 102 tools and 222 playbooks behind it.
Multi-angle research sweep
Filed company financials
Editable deck
Ownership and factory mapping
Company registry lookup
Competitor price and assortment tracking
Garment carbon and water footprint
Digital product passport
Live certificate check
Handed to
Categories the portfolio spans
Get started
Start with the question a groups & enterprise actually has, and leave with the file.